[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: state of openarc.org
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: state of openarc.org
- From: Andrew Beverley <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:24:02 +0000
In contrast, with your message I am seeing the first signature (from your outgoing sealer? simplelists.com) fail at the openarc list server, but it is not annotated why:
Thanks for pointing this out. I suspect this is caused by another bug (which I will be opening a PR for):
If a key specifies the hash (eg "h=sha256") then OpenARC does not use this correctly and instead defaults to sha1, which will then fail to verify if the signature is sha256.
If the hash is blank then everything works as expected. Andy
state of openarc.org | "A. Schulze" <sca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: state of openarc.org | Pete Holzmann <webbed.pete@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: state of openarc.org | "A. Schulze" <sca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: state of openarc.org | Jered Floyd <jered@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: state of openarc.org | Jered Floyd <jered@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: state of openarc.org | Jered Floyd <jered@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: state of openarc.org | Andrew Beverley <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: state of openarc.org | Jered Floyd <jered@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |