Re: Is forward@xxxxxxxxxxx working properly?

[Benny Pedersen <me@xxxxxxx>]

On 2021-09-16 17:55, Administrator wrote:

> I don't remember how I solved, but last spring I started using Rspamd
> in place of Spamassin. Since Rspamd has ARC support built in, I
> stopped using openarc.

metacpan Mail::DKIM have ARC, there is just none perl module in 
spamassassin that use it currently, but all this is imho planned for 
spamassassin 4.x.x, so i think its a bit unfair to say spamassassin cant

what spamassasssin cant is to DKIM Sign, and ARC Sign, there is no point 
if it should or not, its not even a bug

but the verify miss, if maillists stop breaking DKIM, there would not be 
any needs for ARC at all

silly part is that maillists servers do add there own DKIM, fail !!!

it would be ARC sign to work, only execption is if maillist is 
origination mails with maillist do sometime it must be dkim signed, but 
not arc signed, dkim resign is basicly broken in therms of arc

hope rfc's will clean up what signers and verifiers do, or not do

finaly whoe leeds https://github.com/fastmail/authentication_milter

i wish it to be common used